Frazee identifies western individualism (that leads to a dysfunctional or co-dependent culture in churches and small groups) as a major obstacle to spiritual growth. His solution is to unite the church around a common, biblical purpose that revolves around the overarching purposes of loving God and neighbor that are facilitated by:
- common belief (doctrines),
- spiritual practices (spiritual disciplines), and
- virtues (character).
- authority (because disclosure without accountability creates co-dependency),
- a common creed/affirmation,
- traditions,
- spiritual practices, and a
- common mission.
There are some things in this section that both our American culture and our church heritage have an aversion to for various reasons. Keeping these in mind, reflect on some of the possible benefits and/or pitfalls of this overall framework. Was there anything you disagreed with in this overall framework and why? What do you find of most value in this reading?
.
(Note: If you do not have a blogger account, then respond as "other" rather than "anonymous," and be sure to include your name.)
click on the "COMMENTS" link at the bottom right of a post to share your response and thoughts...